Showing posts with label Cancer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cancer. Show all posts

Wednesday, 19 June 2013

FDA Panel to Consider Two Cancer Drugs

Register Today

Earn Free CME Credits by reading the latest medical news in your specialty.

Sign Up
By David Pittman, Washington Correspondent, MedPage Today

WASHINGTON -- The FDA's Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee will meet Thursday to weigh the evidence for approval of two different cancer therapies: tivozanib and a drug-device product combining melphalan (Alkeran) with a novel infusion kit.

The experimental advanced renal cell carcinoma drug, Aveo Pharmaceuticals' tivozanib, met its primary endpoint of progression-free survival in one phase III clinical trial, the FDA said Tuesday.

But it failed to improve overall survival when compared with sorafenib (Nexavar), the agency explained in briefing documents released before an advisory committee meeting.

Tivozanib bettered progression-free survival to 11.9 months from 9.1 months compared with sorafenib (P=0.04), a controlled, randomized trial of 517 patients showed.

However, overall survival -- the study's secondary endpoint -- was worse in the tivozanib arm compared with sorafenib, although not significantly so (28.8 months versus 29.3 months, respectively, P=0.11).

"We are asking the ODAC's advice on whether this single trial is sufficient to support approval of tivozanib for the indication of treatment of patients with advanced renal cell cancer or whether an additional trial is necessary before considering marketing approval," FDA reviewers wrote to advisory committee members.

The FDA expressed concern about the downward trend in overall survival in a single phase III study in a May 2012 meeting with the Cambridge, Mass., manufacturer, Aveo.

There are seven drugs approved to treat advanced renal cell carcinoma that inhibit vascular endothelial growth factor or its receptor like tivozanib does. All but one approval was based on improvement in progression-free survival.

The FDA failed to note any serious concerns in its 13-page briefing document for the drug. Tivozanib and sorafenib had a similar number of deaths due to adverse events (13 versus 12, respectively). The FDA is due to render its decision by July.

After its Thursday morning session on tivozanib, the ODAC will reconvene in the afternoon to assess a drug-device combination product to treat unresectable ocular melanoma that is metastatic to the liver -- a product that received a much harsher criticism from the FDA.

The ODAC will consider melphalan (Alkeran) -- which is already approved to treat multiple myeloma and ovarian cancer -- and the novel Melblez Kit. The device delivers the drug by percutaneous hepatic artery infusion. Blood is then filtered through a double-balloon catheter to extract the drug before returning clean blood to the body. Melphalan is delivered under general anesthesia every 4 to 8 weeks.

"Substantial and severe toxicity" was identified in all three trials, the FDA said, with 7% of patients dying from toxic reaction.

An analysis by the FDA found lot-by-lot differences in the risk of fatal side effects. The agency said in the briefing documents that the manufacturer, New York City's Delcath Systems, had not pinpointed the manufacturing attributes that correlate to clinically important adverse reactions.

"Until the critical quality attributes are defined and validated, FDA will require clinical testing to support approval of modifications of the device for changes in the hemoperfusion filter cartridge component, to characterize the risks of such changes," FDA reviewers stated.

The FDA wants a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy that contains elements to assure safe use, restricting prescribing to providers who have completed training on the device's safety.

In an open, randomized trial of 83 patients, melphalan showed statistically significant improvement in hepatic progression-free survival compared with what site investigators determined was the best alternative care (7.0 months vs. 1.6 months, P=0.001).

There was less of a difference in overall progression-free survival (4.7 months vs. 1.6 months, P<0.0001), and no difference in overall survival (9.8 months vs. 9.95 months, P=0.20).

About 2,500 adults are diagnosed with ocular melanoma every year, and between a quarter and a half will develop metastatic disease within 2 years to 5 years. Metastases occur most in the liver, the FDA said.

The agency is seeking the ODAC's opinion on the safety and approval of the drug-device combination before rendering its decision, which is due by June. The agency isn't bound to follow the opinion of its advisory committees but usually does.

David Pittman

David Pittman is MedPage Today’s Washington Correspondent, following the intersection of policy and healthcare. He covers Congress, FDA, and other health agencies in Washington, as well as major healthcare events. David holds bachelors’ degrees in journalism and chemistry from the University of Georgia and previously worked at the Amarillo Globe-News in Texas, Chemical & Engineering News and most recently FDAnews.

ASCO: Rare Eye Cancer Yields to Targeted Drug

Register Today

Earn Free CME Credits by reading the latest medical news in your specialty.

Sign Up
By Crystal Phend, Senior Staff Writer, MedPage Today Reviewed by Robert Jasmer, MD; Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine, University of California, San FranciscoThis study was published as an abstract and presented at a conference. These data and conclusions should be considered to be preliminary until published in a peer-reviewed journal.The novel kinase inhibitor selumetinib may be the first treatment to shrink advanced uveal melanoma, based on phase II trial results.Note that selumetinib blocks mitogen-activated protein (MAP), also known as extracellular signal-regulated kinases, which are together dubbed MEK.

CHICAGO -- The novel kinase inhibitor selumetinib may be the first treatment to shrink advanced uveal melanoma, based on phase II trial results.

Half of patients on selumetinib saw their tumor shrink at least somewhat compared with 11% on temozolomide (Temodar), a standard chemotherapy used for skin melanoma, Richard Carvajal, MD, of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York City, and colleagues found.

Fully 15% of patients had at least a 30% reduction in tumor volume on the novel drug compared with none on temozolomide, the researchers reported here at the American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting.

Progression-free survival was also 54% better with the agent than with temozolomide (16 versus 7 weeks, P=0.0003).

The novel kinase inhibitor could become a standard since there isn't one for uveal melanoma other than enrolling patients in clinical trials, Carvajal told reporters at a press briefing.

"This is the first time any systemic therapy has been shown to work in patients with ocular melanoma. This disease has been viewed as practically untreatable until now," commented Michael Atkins, MD, a melanoma specialist and deputy director of Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center in Washington, D.C.

The results represent a breakthrough that could lead to further advances, Atkins said in an email to MedPage Today.

"This opens the door not only for treatment of patients with metastatic uveal melanoma, but also for testing more potent MEK inhibitors, MEK inhibitors-based combinations, and even testing MEK inhibitors in the adjuvant setting for patients with tumors containing high-risk features," he said.

Sapna Patel, MD, a melanoma oncologist at MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, wasn't so impressed by the response rate but agreed that it will spark a shift in options for patients who have had none.

"Although the response rate was quite small in a small fraction of patients, for the first time there is an effective therapy now for this disease and it's a starting off point now to consider combining this treatment with other treatments," she told MedPage Today.

Selumetinib blocks mitogen-activated protein (MAP), also known as extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK), which are together dubbed MEK. Genetic mutations in Gnaq and Gna11 activate that pathway to fuels cancer cell growth in more than 85% of ocular melanomas.

In the randomized trial, about 80% of the 98 metastatic uveal melanoma patients had one of the two mutations. The trial also included some wild-type gene patients but analyses yielded the same results including or excluding them.

Overall survival numerically favored twice-daily selumetinib at 75-mg but the difference wasn't significant compared with 150-mg/m2 temozolomide taken four times daily (mean 11 versus 9 months, P=0.4).

Carvajal suggested that the extensive crossover to selumetinib after disease progression in the control arm, about 80%, may have impacted that comparison.

No complete responses by RECIST criteria occurred.

Selumetinib is also being investigated as a treatment for cancers of the thyroid and lung, although with negative phase II results in endometrial cancer.

Another MEK inhibitor, trametinib (Mekinist), was approved on Wednesday for melanoma.

Physicians might generalize the results to the commercially available option, Patel suggested in an interview, but more study is needed, particularly in further honing the patient population who benefits, she noted.

"As with some of our past experiences, when the response rate is low we have to do better at identifying who is the patient that's going to respond," Patel said.

She cautioned that the one of the limitations of the current study was lack of tumor assessment at week 12; it's not clear if the patients on selumetinib actually progressed at week 12 rather than week 16. "If that is the case, then the magnitude of the benefit is reduced," she said.

The researchers reported no conflicts of interest.

Primary source: American Society of Clinical Oncology
Source reference:
Carvajal RD, et al. "Phase II study of selumetinib (sel) versus temozolomide (TMZ) in gnaq/Gna11 (Gq/11) mutant (mut) uveal melanoma" ASCO 2013.

Crystal Phend

Staff Writer

Crystal Phend joined MedPage Today in 2006 after roaming conference halls for publications including The Medical Post, Oncology Times, Doctor's Guide, and the journal IDrugs. When not covering medical meetings, she writes from Silicon Valley, just south of the San Francisco fog.